Two quotations land on the purchasing desk. Both are for a 15 kW, 4-pole, 400 V, foot-mounted motor, yet one costs noticeably more than the other. Purchasing wants to know why they shouldn't just take the cheaper one; production wants to know what the extra money actually buys. Both are fair questions. The power on the nameplate may match, but the materials inside, the labour spent in the factory and the conditions attached to the order rarely do.
The clearest way to explain the gap is to peel the motor apart in layers: the active material that turns electricity into torque, the mechanical parts that carry it, the manufacturing and test routine, and finally the options and commercial terms wrapped around the order.
Copper and electrical steel: where most of the cost sits
In an induction motor, the largest share of the material cost usually goes into the copper of the stator winding and the laminated electrical steel of the stator and rotor cores. These two materials also decide efficiency. A larger copper cross-section lowers resistive losses; thinner, low-loss laminations reduce iron losses. The motor runs cooler and delivers more of the power it draws to the shaft.
That is why price climbs with efficiency class. For a 4-pole 15 kW motor at 50 Hz, the minimum efficiency under IEC 60034-30-1 is 92.1% for IE3, 93.9% for IE4 and 95.1% for IE5. Two or three points sounds small, but reaching them typically means a longer core, reworked slot geometry and more copper. An IE4 or IE5 motor simply contains more raw material than an IE3 unit of the same rating.
Winding material deserves its own question. Some low-cost motors use aluminium or copper-clad aluminium conductors. HEM Motor windings are 100% electrolytic copper with vacuum impregnation, and it is worth checking that competing quotes state their winding material just as clearly. If you are weighing classes against running hours, our IE3 vs IE4 investment comparison works through the payback logic.
Frame, shaft and bearings
The mechanical parts are the next big block of cost. Frame material comes first. A GG20 cast iron frame is heavier, damps vibration better and copes with dust, knocks and outdoor duty; it also costs more to cast and machine. Aluminium frames are lighter and common in selected small ratings. We explain the trade-off in detail in cast iron or aluminium body.
Shaft steel and the bearing arrangement get less attention but shape service life. A C45 carbon-steel shaft machined to IEC dimensions, with bearings sized for the frame and packed with high-temperature grease, sets how often you will be changing bearings. When a quote says nothing about these, part of the low price may be hiding there.
Manufacturing discipline and routine testing
Identical materials do not guarantee identical motors. Dynamic balancing of the rotor to G2.5 or G6.3, vacuum impregnation of the winding and electrostatic powder coating all take time and equipment.
Testing is a cost too: winding resistance, insulation resistance with a 500 V megger, a high-voltage test, no-load and load runs, noise and vibration checks. A supplier who skips them saves money on paper, and the defect shows up during commissioning or in the first months of operation. The buyer's question is simple: which routine tests did this motor pass, and is there a record?
What the order itself adds
A standard motor normally ships with IP55 protection, class F insulation and B3 foot mounting. Every step away from that changes the price and often the lead time:
- Mounting: B5 or B35 flange versions need extra parts and machining; vertical positions such as V1 or V5 must be stated.
- Protection and insulation: IP56, IP65 or class H insulation are non-standard.
- Sensors and heaters: PTC or PT100 winding sensors and anti-condensation heaters are optional extras.
- Voltage and finish: a 400/690 V winding, a special voltage or a specific RAL colour is fixed at order stage.
We cover each of these in how options and accessories affect motor price. The key point: if one quote is B35 with PTC and the other is B3 without sensors, the difference is one of scope, not of price.











